Take back our schools!
Demand Better Governance of Seattle Public Schools
The SPS School Board is using an unproven, undemocratic governance model to make decisions. Learn more and demand better governance of SPS!
Demand Better Governance of Seattle Public Schools
THE SEATTLE TIMES - MAY 16, 2025
After 34 years of writing about education, I’m pretty convinced that everyone who volunteers their time to help run public schools starts out wanting to do right by kids, even if those good intentions sometimes go off the rails.
That is especially true in Seattle...
As a parent, you want your child to have a safe, enriching, and high-quality education. You assume the school board and district leaders have a process to make decisions to reach that goal on behalf of all students. Yet in recent years, Seattle has seen the District and School Board make decisions that don’t make sense and don’t represent the best interests of our children.
Consider these recent examples in SPS:
Inconsistent policies and a lack of clear action on school safety have left parents and students feeling unprotected.
The failed proposal for school closures was formulated without input from parents or teachers and ignored proven data.
The erosion of Advanced Learning and Highly Capable (HC) programs and services, despite a constitutional mandate to deliver these services.
In the last several years, misguided enrollment practices have caused thousands of families to be turned away from their preferred neighborhood and option schools.
When decisions don’t make sense, it is often the way decisions are made that is at fault. If you’ve ever felt like your voice doesn’t matter in district decisions or that the board isn’t listening, the School Board’s current governance model is likely why.¹⁴
Governance is how a group of people makes decisions and holds each other accountable. Businesses, nonprofits, and public institutions often set up a clear process so everyone knows how decisions will be made and who’s responsible for making them. A shared approach helps keep decisions consistent, transparent, and focused on the community’s goals.
The Board prioritizes standardized test scores,¹³ basing decisions almost exclusively on their impact on those outcomes. Critical issues such as school safety, staffing shortages, class sizes, transportation, and curriculum choices (e.g., advanced learning, STEM, dual language, option schools) are treated as secondary, and board members are discouraged from addressing them.
Board members are encouraged to leave critical decisions up to the superintendent and staff and to avoid oversight. The Board eliminated its Finance Committee soon after adopting SOFG, amid major budget deficits.¹² Ethical concerns have been raised about potential conflicts of interest among District leadership, but SOFG prevents the Board from discussing them.
Engagement sessions, public testimony at board meetings, and “office hours” with board members have decreased in line with the SOFG Manual (p. 5).⁴ The board has been criticized for insufficient engagement with parents and teachers,¹⁵ tending towards “inform” or “ignore” rather than “involve” or “collaborate” according to the Spectrum of Community Engagement.⁷
SPS spends an undisclosed amount of money on consultants¹⁸ to implement SOFG while the District faces a $100M budget deficit. The public never authorized the use of public funding for a third-party governance model.¹¹
Student Outcomes Focused Governance (SOFG) is a model that the Seattle School Board adopted in 2021 to set goals and make decisions for the district.¹⁴
Under SOFG:
Boards are introduced to SOFG and related models at conferences and in trainings where there’s a reported pattern of indoctrination and shaming by trainers.⁹
School boards are instructed to set “aspirational test score goals”¹ then shift the blame to teachers and schools when goals aren’t met, rather than the school board or consultants.⁴
Board members are trained to avoid spending time on “adult inputs”⁴ such as budget management, staffing, class sizes, facilities, transportation, student well-being, safety, and other concerns.⁵
SOFG is leading SPS down a failing path. Our students deserve better. Seattle families deserve a school board that listens to them, prioritizes holistic student success, and makes decisions with transparency and accountability. If we want better schools for our children, we must demand better governance.
Learn how SOFG differs from other models used by school boards to make decisions that prioritize transparency, accountability, and community involvement.
Listen for SOFG terms such as “goals and guardrails,” “student outcomes,” and “adult behaviors.”⁴
Email or call your school board representatives and ask them to adopt a better way of making decisions. Urge them to prioritize real community engagement and student-centered policies beyond test scores.
Position opening up? Consider running¹⁶ and vote with SOFG in mind.
Connect with organizations working to hold the school board accountable like All Together For Seattle Schools.
Join an advocacy group at your school, or create one.
Collaborate with other advocacy groups to amplify efforts.
Attend public meetings and voice concerns about how the board’s failed decision-making impacts your child’s education.
Demand transparency from the board about how decisions are being made and who is influencing them.
Request public records to find out how much SPS is spending on SOFG-related training, consultants, and implementation.
Demand transparency about why this money isn’t being invested in classrooms, student support services, or teacher salaries.
View and add Public Records Requests (PRRs) at SPS by the Numbers, a community-made public archive.
Help raise awareness by writing letters to state lawmakers, speaking with local media, writing op-eds, or sharing your concerns on social media.
SOFG was created in 2014 by Airick Leonard West with Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS).⁴ In 2016, West changed his name to AJ Crabill¹⁰ and was hired by Texas Education Agency (TEA) to create an iteration of SOFG known as Lone Star Governance (LSG). Crabill is a self-professed “Student Outcomes Evangelist”³ whose work is rooted in standardized testing and backed by organizations like the Gates Foundation, which has invested substantially in promoting charter and private schooling.⁸ Crabill's résumé is stacked with positions that advance his goal of transitioning the “nation's 14,000 school boards” to SOFG-style models,³ including positions such as board trainer, SXSW EDU conference advisory council, and self-published author.
Many SOFG-led districts are under threat of school closures, including Fort Worth, TX; San Francisco, CA; Columbus, OH; San Antonio, TX; and Aurora, CO.
In 2023, TEA took over the Houston Independent School District⁶ and made drastic changes strongly opposed by parents. Changes included implementing an educator evaluation system, removing librarians, and surveilling classrooms for disruptive students 24/7 via Zoom.¹⁷
In an effort to implement the model in as many districts as possible, Crabill has created iterations of SOFG at the state level in Texas, Nevada, and North Dakota. In ND, the legislature passed funding to train all 168 school boards in the state.²
Despite being introduced and implemented in school boards across the country, its effectiveness remains unproven.¹
Student Outcomes Focused Governance, in Seattle – Rainy Day Recess Podcast (previously Seattle Hall Pass), Season 2, Episode 4, September 18, 2024
Seattle’s School Board Should Move Away from SOFG – Robert Cruickshank, Opinion in The Stranger, July 3, 2023
AJ Crabill Framework: Unproven, Unaccountable, Undemocratic – SF Education Alliance, June 20, 2023
A Critique of Student Outcomes Focused Governance – Uriah Ward, School Board Member of St. Paul Public Schools, MN, October 21, 2024
The 31% No One Talks About: A living reference on district staffing and the structural budget problem in Seattle Public Schools – Albert J. Wong, April 28, 2025